I wish I could remember the name of the
instructor I had for my Survey of American Literature course at Metro
State. It was the fall of 1996. I was a young man then. What I
remember of the course is this: the ratio of female to male students
was amazing. By amazing, I mean that out of the twenty of us, three
were male. This was how I would have wanted to see the whole world at
that stage of my life. I had just turned twenty-four; you can
imagine my mindset.
There was something else that was odd
about that class. There were a few literature majors in that twenty.
Almost all of the students were education majors. And of the lit
majors, I recall being the only writer.
One day we were discussing John
Steinbeck's “The Chrysanthemums.” Then, as now, I greatly
admire John Steinbeck. The discussion was moving to a very
mid-1990s, feminist slant. It was an interesting argument, this I
remember. When it came my turn to speak, I simply mentioned that the
flowers, the scissors and the roles of the characters really had very
little to do with the climate of the story. The story was not
allegory for allegory sake. The words are a record of California,
dead days as a comparison of the Ford and the burro drawn wagon. And
if anything, the story is about the evolution of life in the
California countryside. I was met with angry words, my classmates
thought I was diminishing important social observations and
overlooking a level of misogynistic preludes in the text. When I
furthered verbalized my thoughts, I came to this: “John Steinbeck
is probably the greatest writer that America has ever had.” Before
I was to be eaten alive, our instructor (I wish I could remember her
name) saved me. She said: “Anthony comes from a different world
view. Anthony is a writer and Steinbeck is a writer's writer.”
And with that, it ended.
When it came time in that survey course
for Henry James I learned to keep my mouth shut. Henry James was
popular with my classmates. I hated having to read it. In fact, I
learned to hate Henry James. In a private conference with the
instructor, I voiced my venomous opinion about this particular
writer. All she said was this, “Anthony, wait until you're forty
to read James. I bet it won't make much sense to you until your'e forty.” Okay, so she released me from further reading of Henry
James for years. I would not be required to read any more Henry
James for fourteen years.
I turn forty in August.
Henry James? Well, if anything, it's
time.
As the summer reading list develops, I
know I must have some diversion from some Henry James, but I know I
have to keep to the agreement made so many years ago. So here it
is:
Henry James The Beast in the Jungle
Kazuo
Ishiguro The Remains of the Day
Antonio
Skarmeta The Postman
Pablo
Neruda Poetry
Lemony
Snicket (don't laugh, I love it)
Henry
James The Turn of the Screw
Kazuo
Ishiguro A Pale View of Hills
No comments:
Post a Comment