In the study of classical
economics, Adam Smith tells us of unlimited human desires overlaid on
very limited resources. In that balance between desires and
resources, most of our conflicts and problems arise. Aside from the I
want, I want, I want or perhaps
in our modern condition, iWant, iWant, iWant, there
are other concerns entirely.
I
have come to understand my position on prosperity and thrift even
more fully with age. Over the years I have seen many of my friends
take on absurd amounts of debt, liabilities and stresses because they
have either wanted something, been told they want something, or have
made the decision that having something is more valuable than the
time it would take to pay it off.
It
is easy to put money in the center of prosperity and thrift, as money
is the most tangible thing we all seem to agree upon. And even the
words prosperity and
thrift invoke the idea
of money. And when it comes down to it, we trade all sorts of things,
time, morals and life for money. In this way, we have all learned
that time is money.
Perhaps time is money,
and that is something that I never say, never think, nor have I ever
believed. In fact, my ideas are the exact opposite: money
is time.
In
this discussion of prosperity, I feel like the modern ideal, at least
for many of my fellow countrymen, is a fickle if not intangible
thing. For most, prosperity is a feeling of financial well-being.
That feeling of financial well-being that comes from a home (complete
with mortgage) and a retirement account. If these sorts of things
make a person feel more secure, so be it, but how secure is someone
with these things? Having a mortgage on a home has many benefits, and
perhaps these benefits are more than the problems. A mortgage, after
all, means that the bank actually owns the house. No matter how much
a mortgage is, a significant portion of the payment goes to interest
and that interest is freely given to unseen, unknown persons. And the
retirement account? It really has two variables: when you get in, and
when you get out. I feel like these are the sorts of things that are
good uses of money, and perhaps that relates to good uses of time.
I
also think for most people, the notion of prosperity comes with an
image, whether it's the location of a home, or a specific automobile
or a brand of clothing. This sort of prosperity is just a sign of
prosperity rather than that of being prosperous. Again, there is
nothing wrong with having the “finer” things in life, and should
that make a person happy, so be it. Since I have lived in a glass
house for most of my life, I will never throw stones. I have no
reason to judge one way or the other how anyone lives their life, how
they spend their time, or their money.
I do,
however, see a great many holes in the system in which we live.
The
biggest hole is the rate in which we use our resources. I find cars
and superfluous plastic things to be such a waste of time and money
and the environment in which we all live. I find that the flashing
ads, the TV shows, the print ads, the internet banners, all of it to
be increasingly strange and bizarre. I don't think any of this stuff
has changed since the onset of advertising and marketing tactics, but
I think it's continuously becoming more and more personal. If I look
at the Internet and I decide that I want to look at paper lamps, then
I will get dozens, if not hundreds of ads for paper lamps. In this
way, we are constantly reminded of whatever it was we were in mind to
buy, and it is all too easy to buy. To buy it and to keep buying.
The
other big hole I see in the system is the seemingly surrender of
attitudes about what is a need. Let us never forget those things that
we need and those things we want. I feel like it is okay to want what
you need but not to need what you want. Because when you really think
about it, the things you need, truly need, it is a very small list.
For me, the only things that I truly need, the only things I truly
value, have a heartbeat. Anything in my home, in my life, or the
greater part of the world that I live that doesn't have a heartbeat
can be replaced if missed.
I
wonder about this notion of prosperity. When you populate your life
with the people in your family and in your community and foster
relationships, is this not prosperity? When you find a passion,
whatever it maybe, and pursue that passion whether or not there is a
monetary gain, is that not prosperity? Juxtapose that on the desire
of money and monetary gain for the sake of money and monetary gain,
how then is this prosperous when at the end of a day or the end of a
life there is nothing more to show for it than material goods, bad
health and no company to sooth you?
If
prosperity has a subjective meaning, what does it mean to thrifty? I
think for most, thrifty means to be cheap or perhaps stingy or
frugal. It's a fickle word, this thrifty, but does it have to be? My
favorite definition of thrifty comes from the Boy Scouts of America
as the 9th
point of the Scout law:
A Scout is thrifty. A Scout works to pay his way and to help others.
He saves for the future. He protects and conserves natural resources.
He carefully uses time and property.
I also think that the
idea of using time and property carefully is not too difficult a
concept, but it is often a difficult practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment