Available HERE |
On my
first day of graduate school, I could hardly contain my excitement.
It was a cold Vermont January. The Goddard College campus was not
only very far away from my home of Denver, Colorado, but it was
nearly foreign when compared to my daily existence. And the wildest
part of all, that first day, I checked into a dormitory room. It was
the first dorm I ever used. And my first roommate was already there.
“Hello,” he said. “Hi,” I answered. “What's your focus?”
he asked. “Focus?” I repeated. “Yes,” he said. “What do
you write?” “Oh,” I said. “Fiction.” “I'm sorry,” he
said. “What?” I asked. “My condolences,” he said. “What's
your focus?” I asked. “Poetry,” he said. I recall the
conversation here in exact clarity, this was the only conversation I
had with that particular roommate. He and I did not room together
after that first semester. Sadly, this conversation became the
embodiment of poets for me.
I had been to
poetry readings. In the early 1990s I went to the poetry slams that
happened in the darkened late-night coffeehouses that skirted my
neighborhood. The poets there were edgy, I thought, dark maybe.
There was a black T-shirted guy at the Mercury Cafe one night who
single-handedly ended my curiosity about poets, poetry readings and
“the scene.” He stood at the mike and took a long pull from his
cigarette and reflectively leaned in: “This poem is about yuppies
and why I hate them!” he began. It's been well over 20 years since
that night and I still remember that line.
But
these are only two poets. And I've only explained two experiences.
I still read poetry: Baudelaire, Longfellow and Rosetti are on my
nightstand. So is Melanie Whithaus's book Enigma.
There has never been much of a shift, not for me. I read Elizabeth
Bishop in bath a few years back and I read Langston Hughes over the
few days before my son was born. I've always gotten something from
my reading of poetry. It makes me think differently about images and
it makes me feel differently about words. I know that poetry is
important. Do you?
At the
onset of Umbrella Factory Magazine, Mark
Dragotta and Janice Hampton and I talked in pairs or all three about
the magazine's concept. We talked about what a magazine should be.
We talked about expansive growth, possibilities and taking over the
world. Our conversations never left the world of prose: fiction and
nonfiction. I think it was Mark who, almost as an afterthought said,
“what about poetry?” Blank stares. What about it? None of us
knew the first thing about it. Partly because it was not our
background and partly because it was not of interest to us, poetry
and its place in UFM was
now subject for debate.
And
really, there was no debate. We found a poet who started with us.
His work was invaluable to the formation of the magazine and our role
in the system of literary magazines. When our first poet left, he
went to become the head editor of another magazine. And Julie Ewald,
our current poet and poetry editor has been with us since issue 3,
and her influence has shaped not only my impression but the flavor of
our magazine. In the 16 issues of Umbrella Factory
Magazine there has always been
room, and plenty of it, for poetry and for poets.
For a moment, it's
probably prudent to break down both sides: the poet and the literary
magazine.
The
poet has more work to do than the “why I hate yuppies” guy.
Sure, there is the raw emotion, the truly uncensored heart of the
artist that fits into the strophes and staffs and stanzas. I suspect
this is only a small portion of the work that's done. Yeah, reading
at the open mike night, or an organized poetry event is part of it
too. The readings must be rehearsed. I know in early days of UFM
when we hosted readings, many of the poets who read were very
polished, professional, well spoken (even when reading). The work of
a poet may well start with the raw energy of “yuppies and why I
hate them” but this cannot be where it ends. A successful poet is
one who reads poetry incessantly. A successful poet is one who
labors over a piece, a stanza, a line or a word. A successful poet
probably will not begin a poem with “yuppies and why I hate them.”
What becomes of a
poem? The way I see it, the poet has three options for a single
poem. First, the poet gets involved in the reading circuit. In this
regard, the poem will get a revision during every read which means
that the poem then becomes fluid. Second, the poet can take a
handful of poems and assemble them into a larger project called a
chapbook which I discussed last week. And third, the poet gets
involved in the literary magazine circuit.
Literary Magazines
are not altruistic affairs.
Let me tell you who
I think the market is for literary magazines. I think the sole
market for literary magazines are for the writers and poets who
submit to them. Oftentimes, I wonder if these writers and poets even
read the magazines they submit to. And if there is a reader who is
not a writer or poet, this reader is related to the writer or poet
who contributes to the magazine.
So why do it? Why
have a magazine? Well, I'd think that most magazine founders, not
unlike us, believe that they are doing something different,
revolutionary and important. Of course, there is a selfish side to
it. When you work a magazine, you work a magazine. It's great for
the CV, networking and meeting other editors and other magazines.
It's a great place to meet other writers and poets. It's what we do.
It's a vehicle to get a wider audience for both the magazine itself
and the writers and poets within it.
It all begins with
the literary magazines. This is the place where writers and poets
get started. Smaller journals, especially the independent magazines,
make the evolution of literature possible. Without the work done by
writers and poets and distributed by the literary magazine, what we
read, I believe, would all become corporate template literature. And
that's not literature at all.
Next: Part 3 :Enigma, a review.
No comments:
Post a Comment